The Difference Between ChatGPT And Generative AI

What Is AI Agent Washing And Why Is It A Risk To Businesses?

You’ve heard of greenwashing and AI-washing? Now, a new scam called "agent washing" is emerging among vendors eager to capitalize on AI hype. Analysts at Gartner report that out of thousands of purported agentic AI products tested, only about 130 truly meet the criteria. Agentic AI tools are considered the "next generation" of AI because, beyond processing information and generating content (like ChatGPT), they can autonomously take action. To be genuinely agentic, AI applications must complete complex tasks and engage in long-term goal-oriented planning with minimal human input. They achieve this by interfacing with other systems using tools such as web browsers or by writing and executing code.

What Is Agent Washing?

Agent washing is the practice of marketing existing automation technologies—including large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots and robotic process automation (RPA)—as agentic AI when they lack true autonomous capabilities.

Agentic Or Agent Washing?

Understanding the difference between agentic AI and regular automation is crucial:

• AI Customer Service Agents: Often just chatbots that generate advice or connect users to humans, without autonomous action.
• Robotic Process Automation (RPA): Executes pre-programmed tasks (e.g., entering sales transactions) but does not reason, plan, or make decisions.
• LLM Tools with API Access: Require explicit instructions to interact with external systems; true agents can figure out how to communicate or write code to do so independently.
• Orchestration Tools: Platforms that coordinate multiple AI systems but lack autonomous long-term planning and decision-making are not truly agentic.

Examples:

• A chatbot writes emails on command.
• An agent writes emails, identifies recipients, sends them, monitors responses, and generates tailored follow-ups.
• A chatbot searches a product catalog.
• An agent shops across multiple sites, compares prices, places orders, and makes payments autonomously.
Without this understanding, businesses may be misled by generative AI chatbots that seem agentic but are not.

Why Is Agent Washing Dangerous?

Gartner predicts up to 40% of agentic AI projects will fail or be canceled by 2027 due to misunderstandings and inflated expectations. Risks include:
• Misleading Capabilities: Businesses and the public may be disappointed by underperforming AI investments, damaging trust in AI and vendors.
• Operational Risks: Overestimating AI’s ability to handle critical tasks (customer service, cybersecurity) can cause revenue loss, missed opportunities, or legal issues.
• Innovation Impact: Genuine AI innovators may struggle to gain funding and support amid widespread agent washing.

How to Avoid Falling Victim

• Build AI Literacy: Educate individuals and organizations to distinguish true agentic AI from automation.
• Demand Transparency: Vendors should clearly communicate product capabilities and limitations.
By understanding agent washing, businesses can make informed decisions and support authentic AI advancements.

---

Source: Originally published at bernardmarr.com on 5 August 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Understanding Agent Washing

Q: What exactly is "agent washing"? A: Agent washing is when companies market their existing automation technologies, such as chatbots or RPA, as genuinely "agentic AI" when they lack true autonomous capabilities, long-term planning, and minimal human input. Q: How is agentic AI different from regular automation? A: Agentic AI can autonomously complete complex tasks and engage in long-term goal-oriented planning. Regular automation tools like chatbots or RPA execute pre-programmed tasks or require explicit instructions for each step. Q: What are some examples that differentiate agentic AI from simple automation? A: A simple chatbot might write an email when asked. A true agentic AI would not only write the email but also identify recipients, send it, monitor responses, and generate tailored follow-ups without further explicit instructions. Similarly, an agentic AI could autonomously compare prices across multiple websites and place an order, whereas a chatbot would only search a product catalog when prompted. Q: What are the main risks associated with agent washing for businesses? A: Businesses face risks such as disappointing AI investments due to unmet expectations, operational issues from overestimating AI capabilities, and potential damage to trust in AI technology. Genuine AI innovators may also struggle to gain support. Q: How can businesses avoid falling victim to agent washing? A: Businesses should focus on building AI literacy within their organizations to differentiate true agentic AI from mere automation. They should also demand transparency from vendors regarding product capabilities and limitations.

Crypto Market AI's Take

The emergence of "agent washing" highlights a critical challenge in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. As businesses increasingly look to AI for transformative solutions, discerning genuine agentic capabilities from marketing spin is paramount. This trend underscores the importance of robust AI education and clear vendor communication, principles we at Crypto Market AI champion in our own approach to AI agents. Our platform leverages sophisticated AI for market analysis and trading, but we are committed to transparency about our capabilities, ensuring our users understand the distinction between advanced automation and true AI autonomy.

More to Read:

• What is AI-Washing and How to Spot It
• Understanding AI Agents: Capabilities and Risks
• The Future of Finance: AI in Trading