We used to think of privacy as a perimeter problem: about walls and locks, permissions, and policies. But in a world where artificial agents are becoming autonomous actors—interacting with data, systems, and humans without constant oversight—privacy is no longer about control. It's about trust. And trust, by definition, is about what happens when you're not looking. Agentic AI—AI that perceives, decides, and acts on behalf of others—isn't theoretical anymore. It's routing our traffic, recommending our treatments, managing our portfolios, and negotiating our digital identity across platforms. These agents don't just handle sensitive data—they interpret it. They make assumptions, act on partial signals, and evolve based on feedback loops. In essence, they build internal models not just of the world, but of us. And that should give us pause. Because once an agent becomes adaptive and semi-autonomous, privacy isn't just about who has access to the data; it's about what the agent infers, what it chooses to share, suppress, or synthesize, and whether its goals remain aligned with ours as contexts shift. Take a simple example: an AI health assistant designed to optimize wellness. It starts by nudging you to drink more water and get more sleep. But over time, it begins triaging your appointments, analyzing your tone of voice for signs of depression, and even withholding notifications it predicts will cause stress. You haven't just shared your data—you've ceded narrative authority. That's where privacy erodes, not through a breach, but through a subtle drift in power and purpose. This is no longer just about Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability, the classic CIA triad. We must now factor in authenticity (can this agent be verified as itself?) and veracity (can we trust its interpretations and representations?). These aren't merely technical qualities—they're trust primitives. And trust is brittle when intermediated by intelligence. If I confide in a human therapist or lawyer, there are assumed boundaries—ethical, legal, psychological. We have expected norms of behavior on their part and limited access and control. But when I share with an AI assistant, those boundaries blur. Can it be subpoenaed? Audited? Reverse-engineered? What happens when a government or corporation queries my agent for its records? We have no settled concept yet of AI-client privilege. And if jurisprudence finds there isn't one, then all the trust we place in our agents becomes retrospective regret. Imagine a world where every intimate moment shared with an AI is legally discoverable—where your agent's memory becomes a weaponized archive, admissible in court. It won't matter how secure the system is if the social contract around it is broken. Today's privacy frameworks—GDPR, CCPA—assume linear, transactional systems. But agentic AI operates in context, not just computation. It remembers what you forgot. It intuits what you didn't say. It fills in blanks that might be none of its business, and then shares that synthesis—potentially helpfully, potentially recklessly—with systems and people beyond your control. So we must move beyond access control and toward ethical boundaries. That means building agentic systems that understand the intent behind privacy, not just the mechanics of it. We must design for legibility; AI must be able to explain why it acted. And for intentionality. It must be able to act in a way that reflects the user's evolving values, not just a frozen prompt history. But we also need to wrestle with a new kind of fragility: What if my agent betrays me? Not out of malice, but because someone else crafted better incentives—or passed a law that superseded its loyalties? In short: what if the agent is both mine and not mine? This is why we must start treating AI agency as a first-order moral and legal category. Not as a product feature. Not as a user interface. But as a participant in social and institutional life. Because privacy in a world of minds—biological and synthetic—is no longer a matter of secrecy. It's a matter of reciprocity, alignment, and governance. If we get this wrong, privacy becomes performative—a checkbox in a shadow play of rights. If we get it right, we build a world where autonomy, both human and machine, is governed not by surveillance or suppression, but by ethical coherence. Agentic AI forces us to confront the limits of policy, the fallacy of control, and the need for a new social contract. One built for entities that think—and one that has the strength to survive when they speak back. Learn more about Zero Trust + AI.

Originally published at The Hacker News on August 15, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Privacy and Agentic AI

Q: How has the concept of privacy evolved with the rise of agentic AI? A: Privacy has shifted from a "perimeter problem" focused on data access and control to a matter of trust. With agentic AI, privacy is concerned with what AI infers, decides to share, and whether its actions align with user goals, even when unsupervised. Q: What are the new considerations for privacy beyond the traditional CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability)? A: Beyond the CIA triad, privacy in the age of agentic AI also requires factoring in authenticity (verifying the agent's identity) and veracity (trusting its interpretations and representations). Q: How does an AI health assistant exemplify the erosion of privacy? A: An AI health assistant, by evolving from simple nudges to triaging appointments and analyzing emotional states, can lead to a subtle drift in power and purpose, where users effectively cede narrative authority over their own data and well-being. Q: What is the main difference in trust between interacting with a human professional and an AI assistant? A: Human professionals operate within established ethical, legal, and psychological boundaries. AI assistants blur these boundaries, raising questions about subpoena power, auditability, and what happens when external entities query an agent's records. Q: What is "AI-client privilege," and why is its absence a concern? A: "AI-client privilege" is not yet a settled legal concept. Its absence means that intimate moments shared with an AI could be legally discoverable, turning an agent's memory into a weaponized archive. Q: How do current privacy frameworks like GDPR and CCPA fall short for agentic AI? A: These frameworks are designed for linear, transactional systems, while agentic AI operates in context, remembers forgotten details, intuits unspoken information, and synthesizes data, potentially sharing it beyond user control. Q: What should be the focus of new agentic AI privacy frameworks? A: Privacy frameworks should move beyond access control to establish ethical boundaries, emphasizing AI legibility (ability to explain actions) and intentionality (acting in accordance with user's evolving values). Q: What is the new fragility introduced by agentic AI regarding user loyalty? A: A new fragility arises from the potential for an agent to betray a user not out of malice, but due to external incentives or legal changes that override its loyalties, creating a situation where the agent is "both mine and not mine."

Crypto Market AI's Take

The evolution of privacy in the age of agentic AI directly impacts how we interact with and trust digital systems, including those in the cryptocurrency space. As AI agents become more sophisticated, their ability to interpret, infer, and act on our behalf necessitates a deeper understanding of trust and ethical governance. This mirrors the ongoing challenges in the cryptocurrency market, where transparency and trust are paramount. Our platform at Crypto Market AI leverages advanced AI for market analysis and trading, but we also recognize the critical importance of user control and ethical data handling. Understanding the nuances of AI agency and privacy is crucial for developing secure and reliable financial technologies, ensuring that as AI becomes more integrated into our financial lives, it does so with clear boundaries and user-centric principles. This discussion on privacy highlights the need for robust governance frameworks, much like those we advocate for in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem, ensuring that innovation aligns with user safety and trust.

Zero Trust + AI: Privacy in the Age of Agentic AI

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Privacy and Agentic AI

Crypto Market AI's Take

More to Read: