August 8, 2025
5 min read
Luc Jose Adjinacou
Energy Value Reveals Historic BTC Undervaluation
A key indicator, the “Energy Value” from Capriole Investments, estimates Bitcoin’s “fair value” at $167,800, which is 45% above its current price. Developed by Charles Edwards, this model is based on the energy consumed by the Bitcoin network. The unprecedented gap it reveals revives the debate about the true valuation of the asset and the market’s ability to close this gap in the coming months.In brief
- The “Energy Value” metric from Capriole Investments evaluates Bitcoin based on the energy consumed by the network.
- According to Charles Edwards, creator of this model, Bitcoin’s “fair value” reaches $167,800, 45% more than its current price.
- Glassnode data reveals a record hashrate of 1.031 ZH/s and an unprecedented gap between the market and energy value.
- A hashrate drop could quickly reduce the estimated “fair value” and limit upside potential.
- Average energy value: about $145,000 according to the Simple Moving Average of the Energy Value;
- Current price: around $116,000, about 31% discount compared to this estimate;
- Historical comparison: “we are today further from this value at $116,000 than in September 2020, when bitcoin was worth $10,000”, stresses Edwards;
- Recent trend: a drop of about 10% since last month’s all-time high. This finding reveals the growing gap between the robustness of the technical fundamentals and market behavior, increasing investors’ interest in this metric when analyzing bitcoin’s fair valuation.
- Bitcoin Hashrate Nears Record High as Stable Mining Returns Boost Network Security
- Understanding Bitcoin's Fair Value: A Deep Dive into Valuation Models
- The Impact of Energy Costs on Cryptocurrency Mining Profitability
The bitcoin “fair energy value” according to Capriole Investments
While the hash rate of Bitcoin approached a record, driven by mining profitability, Charles Edwards stated on social network X:“Bitcoin should trade up to $167,800 per unit if its price fully reflected its energy value.”Founder of Capriole Investments and creator of this metric in 2019, Edwards explains that his calculation relies on three elements: the energy consumed by the network, the supply growth rate, and a constant representing the dollar value of this energy. According to him, the market massively undervalues Bitcoin today, as the hashrate reached a new record at 1.031 zettahash per second on August 4, proof that the computing power committed by mining companies has never been higher. Data from Glassnode confirms this trend:
Market signals and the shortened time horizon
Beyond the simple comparison between price and energy value, other indicators provide an optimistic reading for mining specialists. The “buy” signal from the Hash Ribbons metric, triggered at the end of July, remains in effect, indicating a favorable environment for profitability and continuation of mining operations. “A constant energy supply represents a balance between supply and demand,” states Capriole Investments. Historically, a sustainable price increase encourages mining companies to increase their computing power, thus improving the network’s energy efficiency and strengthening the Energy Value over the long term. However, this equation can reverse if energy commitment decreases, for example in case of a drop in the hashrate. The calculated “fair value” would then fall, reducing the current gap with the market price. Several analysts believe the current bull cycle would last only a few more months, leaving little time for bitcoin to close this gap. History also reminds us that when prices rise too quickly without a parallel increase in invested energy, it tends to return to its energy value, often abruptly. The unprecedented gap between bitcoin price and its energy value highlights both the strength of its technical fundamentals and the uncertainty inherent in speculative dynamics. If the hashrate continues to rise, the scenario of a partial or full catch-up towards the “fair value” seems credible. However, the time frame mentioned by several observers also requires considering the opposite risk: that of a market unable to follow its own fundamental indicators before the current cycle ends.Source: Energy Value Reveals Historic BTC Undervaluation by Luc Jose Adjinacou